( – promoted by Colorado Pols)
From the AFSCME website.
The 1.4-million-member American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), AFL-CIO, today endorsed New York Senator Hillary Clinton for President of the United States.
“The next president is going to play a critical role in rebuilding America’s middle class and ensuring that everyone shares in our country’s prosperity,” said AFSCME International President Gerald W. McEntee. “President Hillary Clinton will make us stronger at home and respected abroad.”
Full press release after the jump…
Press release from AFSCME on their endorsement of Hillary Clinton for President.
For IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Wednesday, October 31, 2007
AFSCME Endorses Hillary Clinton for President
Politically Active Union Pledges to Mobilize Volunteer Army for Senator Hillary Clinton in Iowa and Across AmericaWASHINGTON, D.C. – The 1.4-million-member American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), AFL-CIO, today endorsed New York Senator Hillary Clinton for President of the United States.
“The next president is going to play a critical role in rebuilding America’s middle class and ensuring that everyone shares in our country’s prosperity,” said AFSCME International President Gerald W. McEntee. “President Hillary Clinton will make us stronger at home and respected abroad.”
AFSCME’s International Executive Board voted to endorse Senator Clinton following an extensive 10-month, member-driven endorsement process – including candidate appearances, interviews and membership polls. The union’s polls show that Senator Clinton enjoys deep support among its members.
“We’ve looked at these candidates closely, and we’ve drilled down deep into the union to see who was inspiring our members, who has what it takes to take back the White House and govern effectively when they get there,” McEntee said. “We looked for the candidate who will fight for working families and who has the greatest ability to win, the candidate who will motivate our members to make calls, knock on doors and talk to their co-workers like never before.”
The politically savvy public service union, known for waging grassroots campaigns, is preparing to launch a major effort in the critical early state of Iowa, where it represents more than 30,000 workers.
AFSCME plans to spend more than $60 million on the 2008 campaign, and will mobilize a 40,000-member army of volunteers to elect Senator Clinton.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: MichaelBowman
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: MartinMark
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: unnamed
IN: At Least She’s Not Your Puppy Murdering Governor
BY: Lloyd42
IN: Educating All Kids Is Still The Right Thing To Do
BY: Lloyd42
IN: Educating All Kids Is Still The Right Thing To Do
BY: Gilpin Guy
IN: Weekend Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
I wonder if Edwards thinks they should be required to get rid of their lobbyists?
I don’t know AFSCME’s internal polling results, but I note a distinct lack of anywhere in that statement that said that Clinton received the most support from the rank-and-file.
Has AFSCME not seen Hillary’s ties to and contributions from… WAL-MART!
If they can get over it why can’t you?
I’ve down more for the movement than I’m sure you’d like to think.
Explain to me why someome who served on the board of directors of WAL-MART, and has received more money from WAL-MART than any other candidate (rep. or dem.), just received one of the biggest Union endorsements?
because union leaders are out for what they can get for themselves and the workers be hanged?
I said why did AFSCME endorse, not why did WAL-MART endorse. Re-read my comments and it might help clear up that distinction.
Working stiffs who think Clinton will stick up for them instead of big health, big insurance, big business and the military industrial machine, from whom she hauls in more money than any other candidate, are seriously deluded.
If a male candidate had Hillary’s voting record, record of supporting NAFTA with no protections for American or foreign workers, record of supporting neocon legislation in the rush to war in Iraq and now in Iran, her fondness for secrecy on a par with Dick Cheney’s, no progressive Dem would be supporting that candidate.
What have the unions come to? Edwards is clearly the best friend American workers have in the field.
Just asked AFSCME to unsubscribe me from their mailing list
Hehehehehe.
This is the best entertainment I’ve had all day. Thanks.
from The NY Times
and to be clear:
Who thinks they just stepped out in front of its rank and file?
this endorsement is bandwagoneering for Hillary.
but that didn’t make a difference with these guys. They are just voting with who they think will win.
…And what will Hillary do for them when she’s in the WH?
A big “nada.”
Another example of labor shooting itself in the foot. Instead of endorsing and helping fund and elect John Edwards, they just jump on the perceived winner bandwagon.
It would be interesting to know where the rank and file is putting its money.
They deserve the lack of audience that they will get.
Some people support candidates because the people think the candidate will vote well. Other people think the candidates will vote well because the people supported them. Of course, the second category tend to be politically powerful already… which is exactly the case here.
And who could blame them? It’s not like they are endorsing a principled candidate who speaks up against the influence of money and powerful special interests in politics. No, that would be Obama, with Edwards in second place. Clinton is advertising that she’ll let herself be influenced by powerful lobby groups; she’s picked her battle in trying to distinguish between the good lobbyists and the bad ones. Unions will certainly fall into the first category, and they can continue to play money politics.
This endorsement, combined with the recent endorsement of corrupt machine-dem Congressman Al Wynn (D-MD), shows that AFSCME isn’t terribly interested in the interests of its members right now.
Mr. McEntee says of challengers within the Democratic Party:
Yep, the AFSCME leadership is firmly in the incumbent-protection business, and nevermind what’s best for the country or district.
This is why union dues should be separate from union political funds, just as corporate money should be separate from their employees’ political donations.
How desperate is Labor to endorse the least Labor-friendly candidate so early on, just because it looks like she’s got the nomination locked up.
Focus on the Family endorsing Giuliani, which hasn’t happened… yet, but when it does…